US court dismisses 1984 riots case against Sonia Gandhi


Write Comment     |     E-Mail To a Friend     |     Facebook     |     Twitter     |     Print

 

New York, 26 Aug 2015: An appeals court here has affirmed a district judge’s order to dismiss a human rights violation lawsuit?filed?against Congress president Sonia Gandhi by a Sikh group in connection with the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case, ruling that the petition lacked merit.

 

The three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that it found the arguments presented by Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) in its case against Gandhi "without merit".

 

The bench of Circuit Judges Jose Cabranes, Renna Raggi and Richard Wesley affirmed the district court’s order of June 9, 2014 in which the judge had dismissed the human rights violation lawsuit?filed by SFJ?against Gandhi.

 

US District Judge Brian Cogan had granted Gandhi’s motion to dismiss the complaint due to "lack of subject matter jurisdiction" and failure to state a claim.

 

"Upon due consideration..., it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgement of the District Court is affirmed," the three-judge bench said in its order issued here yesterday.

 

Gandhi’s lawyer eminent Indian-American attorney Ravi Batra termed the appeals court ruling as "historic" and said the judges have upheld a nation’s sovereignty by declared Gandhi free of any fault - despite SFJ’s "reprehensible defamatory efforts".

 

Batra told PTI in a statement that SFJ should "publically apologise" to Gandhi and to every leader it has sued without just cause or any legal right or standing to do so, and state that it will no longer hurt genuine victims of 1984 by selling false hope that only re-victimises them.

 

"SFJ making false, reprehensible and defamatory allegations against India’s leaders is the wrong recipe," he added.

 

SFJ legal advisor Gurpatwant Singh Pannun said the group will file a petition for a "rehearing en banc" with the appeals court challenge the order?within 14 days of the order.

 

SFJ had filed a lawsuit in 2013 against Gandhi accusing her of allegedly shielding and protecting Congress party leaders in the anti-Sikh riots that had erupted following the assassination of former Prime Minister and her mother-in-law Indira Gandhi.

 

 

Write Comment     |     E-Mail To a Friend     |     Facebook     |     Twitter     |     Print
Comments on this Article
Benedict Noronha, Udupi/India Thu, August-27-2015, 8:27
Truth prevails always and ultimately. What ever be the fowl games, it can never win. One cannot impose false charges on innocent people is the moral of this verdict.
Write your Comments on this Article
Your Name
Native Place / Place of Residence
Your E-mail
Your Comment   You have characters left.
Security Validation
Enter the characters in the image above
    
Disclaimer: Kindly do not post any abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful material or SPAM. BelleVision.com reserves the right to block/ remove without notice any content received from users.
GTI MarigoldGTI Marigold
Anil Studio
Badminton Sports AcademyBadminton Sports Academy

Now open at Al Qusais

Veez Konkani IllustratedVEEZ Konkani

Weekly e-Magazine

New State Bank of India, Customer Service Point
Cool House ConstructionCool House Construction
Uzvaad FortnightlyUzvaad Fortnightly

Call : 91 9482810148

Your ad Here
Power Care
Ryan Intl Mangaluru
Ryan International
pearl printing
https://samuelsequeira.substack.com/publish
Omintec
Kittall.ComKittall.Com

Konkani Literature World

Konkanipoetry.com
Bluechem