Saudi prince convicted of murdering servant in UK
Gulf News
London, 20 October 2010: A Saudi prince was convicted Tuesday of murdering one of his servants in a frenzied attack in a British hotel. A jury in London’s Old Bailey criminal court found Prince Saud Abdul Aziz Bin Nasser Al Saud guilty of murdering Bandar Abdullah Abdul Aziz at the Landmark Hotel in London on February 15.
The 34-year-old prince, whose grandfather is a brother of the current Saudi king, faces a possible life prison term in prison when he is sentenced on Wednesday. The jury deliberated 95 minutes before returning its verdict.
Prosecutor Jonathan Laidlaw said the prince had abused his aide in the past, showing jurors video shot in the Landmark’s elevator which appears to show the shaven-headed prince, dressed in white, throwing his 32-year-old servant around and battering him. Photographs of Abdul Aziz stored on a mobile phone "plainly proved" that there was a "sexual element" to the abuse, Laidlaw said.
Abdulaziz Bin Nasser Al Saud, left, is seen with his servant Bandar Abdulaziz in an elevator in London’s Landmark hotel on January 22, 2010, in closed circuit television footage which was shown during a murder trial in London on October 5
Prince Saud originally told police that he and Abdul Aziz had been drinking into the early hours of the morning, and that when he awoke at 3pm he could not rouse Abdul Aziz. Jurors rejected a claim by his defence lawyer John Kelsey-Fry that the prince was guilty only of manslaughter.
The prince was convicted of both murder and a second count of grievous bodily harm with intent relating to the attack in the elevator. "Beneath the surface this was a deeply abusive relationship which the defendant exploited, as the assaults in the lift so graphically demonstrate, for sadistic reasons, for his own personal gratification," Laidlaw told the jury.
"The abuse extended beyond physical abuse. There was plainly an emotional element and psychological element to it." The prosecutor said Abdul Aziz surrendered meekly to the fatal assault.
"He was killed without apparently ever having fought back because the defendant was completely unharmed, without any mark at all, when he was examined at the police station. Bandar appears to have let the defendant kill him," Laidlaw said.